Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Charles PorterIn re: Charles Porter
as 24-11109
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES M. PORTER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jorge Porter, et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
as 23-13091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMENZA PUERTA and JORGE PORTER
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Integrated National Resources, Inc. et al
as 0:2023mc60989
Defendant:
Rolf Max Hirschmann, Alexandra Porter Bovee, Integrated National Resources, Inc. doing business as Weedgenics and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
In re: Charles Porter
as 23-11103
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES M. PORTER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Marcus PorterIn re: Marcus Porter
as 22-12026
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS TYSHUN PORTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
