Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Burlington Financial Group, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02595
Defendant:
Burlington Financial Group, LLC, Sang Yi, Richard W. Burnham and others
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia ex rel. Christopher M. Carr and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6101
Shen Yi, LLC v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 2:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Shen Yi, LLC
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
John Miller v. Christopher Byers, et al
as 20-11575
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN CLIFTO, CHRISTOPHER BYERS, CAROLINE YI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAMS MILLER
CHEN et al v. Walsh, Sr. et al
as 1:2018cv23894
Plaintiff:
YI GAO, YANG ZHAO, DEXIONG HU and others
Defendant:
JJW CONSULTANCY, LTD., USREDA HOLDINGS, LLC, UNITED STATES REGIONAL ECONOMIC AUTHORITY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Ruby Robinson Co., Inc. v. Food Way USA Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv23784
Defendant:
Food Way USA Corp., Chong H Yi and Rudia S Yi
Plaintiff:
Ruby Robinson Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499
Benbin Zeng v. U.S. Attorney General
as 13-10909
Petitioner:
BENBIN ZENG, a.k.a. Hsin Yi Yang, a.k.a. Ben Bing Zeng
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jin Hua Liu, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-14218
Petitioner:
JIN HUA LIU and YU YI WANG
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Yi Song Jiang v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-13810
Petitioner:
YI SONG JIANG
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
