Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Bruno v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00590
Plaintiff:
Salvador Bruno
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A. and EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Jones v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 3:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon and EMC Mortgage Corporation, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Mathura v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Susan Mathura
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Eustache v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Bashir E. Eustache
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. , EMC Mortgage Corporation , McCurdy & Candler, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Childress v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2010cv04260
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Monique Childress
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association , Homebanc Mortgage Trust 2005-1 , EMC Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Love et al v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv04173
Plaintiff:
Bridget Love and Curry Love, Jr.
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Alexander-Lister v. Homebanc Mortgage, Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv04088
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jo Alexander-Lister
Defendant:
Homebanc Mortgage, Corp., U.S. Bank N.A. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Hernandez v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2010cv00266
Plaintiff:
Jorgita Hernandez
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cornelius v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv03967
Plaintiff:
Jameel Cornelius
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Bank of America N.A., McCurdy & Candler LLC and others
EMC Mortgage Corporation v. Russell
as 1:2010cv03807
Plaintiff:
EMC Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Patricia P. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
