Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Coleman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2013cv01227
Plaintiff:
Wayne J. Coleman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank , Chase Home Finance LLC , Market Street Mortgage Corporation and others
McLean v. Homebanc Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01051
Plaintiff:
Erin Diane McLean
Defendant:
Homebanc Mortgage Corporation, EMC Mortgage Corporation , Citibank, N.A. and others
Conerly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 1:2013cv00915
Plaintiff:
Shetera Q. Conerly
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association , Chase Home Finance , EMC Mortgage Corporation and others
Guzzetti v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2013cv00905
Plaintiff:
James Guzzetti
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association , Barret Daffin , Frappier Levine and Block LLP and others
DeWeese v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ronnie P. DeWeese
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , State Farm Bank, FSB and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Watts v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
Dock Watts, Jr.
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association and Does 1 - 100
Muhammad v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Steve Q. Muhammad
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Law Firm of Mccalla Raymer, LLC
Dodds v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Dodds
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc , Chase Home Finance and others
Rodriguez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv00278
Plaintiff:
Luis Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and Does 1-10 inclusive
Pah v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv04071
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel W. Pah
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
