Cases 21 - 30 of 319
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Littlejohn v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03789
Plaintiff:
Lena Littlejohn
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC, Sheila Sims and John Does Nos 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Anderson et al v. ARC Automotive, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03499
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
Arc Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Anderson et al v. Autoliv, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03477
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
Autoliv Inc., Autoliv ASP Inc., Joyson Safety Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17931
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16630
Plaintiff:
JAMES SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16035
Plaintiff:
RONNY SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13091
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13089
Plaintiff:
JACOB SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OVERBY-SIMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10950
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M OVERBY-SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
