Cases 31 - 40 of 385
Sherbert et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Sherbert, Jerry Wayne Morris, Albert Mount and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18028
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16511
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15793
Plaintiff:
MICAH ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15792
Plaintiff:
LOGAN ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14227
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12943
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERTSON PARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12884
Plaintiff:
BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11795
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Harold Edward Robertson, Robert Charles Robinson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
