Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Miguel Porras v. Point Blank Enterprises, Inc.
as 0:2019cv61881
Plaintiff:
Miguel Porras
Defendant:
Point Blank Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen Blank DDS, PA, et al v. NCMIC Finance Corporation, et al
as 15-11999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEPHEN G. BLANK, a Florida professional association, ROARKE MILLER, JEFFREY KLEIN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NCMIC FINANCE CORPORATION, doing business as Professional Solutions Financial Services, an Iowa corporation authorized to do business in Florida and PSFS 3 CORPORATION
Stephen G. Blank DDS, PA, et al v. NCMIC Finance Corporation, et al
as 15-12000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMIR KHOSHNEVIS, STEPHEN G. BLANK, a Florida professional association, ROARKE MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NCMIC FINANCE CORPORATION and PSFS 3 CORPORATION, an Iowa Corporation
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, et al v. Waterman Broadcasting Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv22007
Defendant:
Tod Beneficiaries on File, Waterman Broadcasting Corporation, Sharon Rosenhause and others
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Wilmington Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Point Blank Solutions, Inc v. Toyobo America, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61166
Plaintiff:
Point Blank Solutions, Inc
Defendant:
Toyobo America, Inc. and Toyobo Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Shapiro et al v. Blank Rome LLP
as 1:2009cv20803
Plaintiff:
Sanford R. Shapiro and Roxanne G. Schwartz
Defendant:
Blank Rome LLP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Point Blank Body Armor Inc., v. BAE Systems Specialty Defense Systems of Pennsylvania,Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv60499
Plaintiff:
Point Blank Body Armor Inc., and Point Blank Body Armor Inc.,
Defendant:
BAE Systems Specialty Defense Systems of Pennsylvania,Inc. and John D. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
