Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 23-10120
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-13031
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12811
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Andrew Suh v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 22-11077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW SUH
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Johnson v. U.S Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
as 3:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Johnson
Defendant:
U.S Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-10954
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Suh v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 6:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Andrew Suh
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-10393
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
