Cases 1 - 10 of 21
James Hairston v. Ivan Negron, et al
as 13-10474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. HAIRSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
IVAN L. NEGRON, M.D., UNKNOWN UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS 1 AND 2, GILBERT MICHEL, M.L.P. and others
Ronald Menard v. USA, et al
as 12-10683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MENARD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PASCO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LEESBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Concepcion v. Tidwell et al
as 5:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
Manuel Concepcion
Defendant:
Mark Tidwell, I. L. Negron, S. Nikbakht and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Menard v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ronald Menard
Defendant:
United States of America, Pasco Regional Medical Center, Leesburg Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blount v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2010cv00655
Plaintiff:
Arlis Glendell Blount
Defendant:
Tamyra Jarvis, Mary M. Mitchell, Lawrence Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McFarland v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2010cv00639
Plaintiff:
James McFarland
Defendant:
Scott A. Middlebrooks, FNU Barton, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hairston v. Negron et al
as 5:2010cv00395
Plaintiff:
James L. Hairston
Defendant:
Ivan L. Negron, Unknown Utilization Review Committee Members 1 and 2, Gilbert Michel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mosqueda v. Drew et al
as 5:2009cv00503
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mosqueda
Defendant:
D. B. Drew and I. L. Negron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crapps v. Chippi et al
as 5:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
Alander Crapps, Jr.
Defendant:
E. J. Chippi, I. L. Negron and R. Roman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Palmer v. James et al
as 5:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
James Palmer
Defendant:
James, Dinino, Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
