Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Burt v. CB Specialists, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02407
Plaintiff:
George Burt
Defendant:
CB Specialists, Inc., Lucky Restaurant Management LLC and Kimberly Mitow
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bryant v. A Roofing Specialist, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv60643
Plaintiff:
Brackie Beau Bryant
Defendant:
A Roofing Specialist, Inc., ARS Roofing Inc. and Eleanor H Bass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Marroquin v. Collision Specialist, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv24523
Plaintiff:
Francis Marroquin
Defendant:
Collision Specialist, Inc., Maria R. Bay, Javier Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Gilliam v. Dealership Detailing Specialists, Inc.
as 8:2014cv02661
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Gilliam
Defendant:
Dealership Detailing Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Collins v. Choice Home Care Specialists Inc
as 2:2014cv01791
Plaintiff:
Angelina Collins
Defendant:
Choice Home Care Specialists Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. Examworks, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02157
Plaintiff:
Jill Richardson
Defendant:
Examworks, Inc. and Medical Evaluation Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Cable Wiring Specialist, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00277
Plaintiff:
Aaron Smith
Defendant:
Cable Wiring Specialist, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Viera v. Field Media Specialists, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
Jose Viera
Defendant:
Field Media Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morales v. Cable Wiring Specialist, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv20464
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Morales
Defendant:
Cable Wiring Specialist, Inc. and Michael T. Henning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pena Jr. v. V & V Real Estate Associates & Financial Specialists, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv02712
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pena Jr.
Defendant:
V & V Real Estate Associates & Financial Specialists, Inc. , Martha I. Vazquez and Jorge Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
