Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Turner v. Tasman Eye Consultants, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv02897
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Turner
Defendant:
Tasman Eye Consultants, P.C. and Dr. Stuart Tasman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Turner v. City of Tallapoosa, Georgia
as 3:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Danny Turner
Defendant:
City of Tallapoosa, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Turner v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2014cv00857
Plaintiff:
Broderick Turner
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jones et al v. Peabody Properties South, LLC
as 1:2013cv02311
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jones and Garon Turner
Defendant:
Peabody Properties South, LLC
Cox v. Corporate Auto Brokers, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01401
Plaintiff:
Emily Joy Cox
Defendant:
Corporate Auto Brokers, Inc. and Charles Turner, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Anderson et al v. Lynch
as 1:2011cv00887
Plaintiff:
Oscar Anderson , Shannon Byrd, Sr. , Kimberly Comer and others
Defendant:
Frank Lynch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Turner v. Buckhead Beef Company
as 1:2010cv02797
Plaintiff:
Henry Turner
Defendant:
Buckhead Beef Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Whitaker et al v. Harris
as 1:2010cv02421
Plaintiff:
Bobby Whitaker
Defendant:
Turner Associates, Architects & Planners, Inc. and Oscar Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Ward v. Bert Bell / Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan et al
as 1:2010cv01776
Plaintiff:
Kurt R. Ward
Defendant:
Bert Bell / Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan, Odessa Turner and Marvin Woodson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The Retirement Board of Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan et al v. Kurt R. Ward Attorney at Law, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01192
Plaintiff:
The Retirement Board of Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Defendant:
Kurt R. Ward Attorney at Law, LLC, Odessa Turner and Marvin Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
