Cases 81 - 90 of 144
Carter v. Galardi South Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02812
Plaintiff:
Lashaun Y. Carter
Defendant:
Galardi South Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Lashaun Carter v. Doll House II, Inc., et al
as 14-13132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LASHAUN Y. CARTER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated who consent to their inclusion in a collective action
Defendant - Appellant:
DOLL HOUSE II, INC., a corporation, d.b.a. Stilettos Gentlemen's Club and THEO LAMBROS, an individual
Victoria Carter v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.
as 14-11691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTORIA CARTER
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1
:
SERVICE
Carter v. Doll House II, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01097
Plaintiff:
Lashaun Y. Carter
Defendant:
Doll House II, Inc. and Theo Lambros
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Carter et al v. Acanfora-Ruohomaki
as 6:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Angeline Carter
Defendant:
K9 Kampus LLC and Sherry Acanfora-Ruohomaki
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Urling v. Ask Solutions, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv02869
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Urling
Defendant:
Ask Solutions, Inc. and Anne Carter-Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hereford v. Carter & Associates, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2013cv03392
Plaintiff:
James Hereford
Defendant:
Carter & Associates, L.L.C. and Peachtree/Carnegie, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Carter et al v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv02492
Plaintiff:
Calvin Thomas and Howard L. Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Peabody Properties South, LLC
Pellecier v. Jacinthe et al
as 0:2013cv61102
Plaintiff:
Phillip Pellecier, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary Jacinthe, Josil Marie, Jonathan Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Carter et al v. Russell Stover Candies, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01552
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Carter , David Michael Smith , Linda Diane Bush and others
Defendant:
Russell Stover Candies, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
