Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Petro v. Green Tree Assisted Living, LLC
as 6:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Crystal Petro
Defendant:
Green Tree Assisted Living, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
VILLA GOMEZ v. KOSTIV AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. et al
as 1:2020cv22519
Defendant:
KOSTIV & ASSOCIATES, P.C., PETRO KOSTIV, KOSTIV AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA YURANY VILLA GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nelson et al v. Petro Gate, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00272
Defendant:
Behnam Bagheri and Petro Gate, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennie Nelson and Sarah Kean
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
MONTEIRO v. UNITED PETRO CONVENIENCE, INC.
as 0:2019cv61010
Defendant:
UNITED PETRO CONVENIENCE, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MONTEIRO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Colon v. 50th Tampa Petro and Services, Inc et al
as 8:2018cv02960
Defendant:
Mdnasirul Shuvo and 50th Tampa Petro and Services, Inc
Plaintiff:
Dylan Colon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PETRO v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv21460
Plaintiff:
DENNIS PETRO
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Fields, et al v. Diamond Resorts International, Inc, et al
as 6:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Fields, Robert Stone, Justin Allis and others
Defendant:
Diamond Resorts International, Inc, Diamond Resorts International, Inc., Diamond Resorts International Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sherill v. Petro Services, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61231
Plaintiff:
Chenita L. Sherill
Defendant:
Petro Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Papatola v. United Petro VIII, Inc.
as 8:2015cv01151
Plaintiff:
Christina Papatola
Defendant:
United Petro VIII, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Byers v. Petro Services, Inc.
as 0:2014cv62794
Plaintiff:
Michael Byers
Defendant:
Petro Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
