Cases 91 - 100 of 1,679
Marshall WilliamsIn re: Marshall Williams
as 23-11239
Petitioner:
In re: MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Ervin v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Gary D. Ervin
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP 1
as 5:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Troy Demetriu Wright
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garraway v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Mitchell Garraway
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cancel-Hernandez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Nestor M. Cancel-Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Qaasim v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Saleel Z. Qaasim
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Saint-Fleur v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
Franck Saint-Fleur
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valentinis-Dee v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
James Valentinis-Dee
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robin KnutsonIn re: Robin Knutson
as 23-10708
Petitioner:
In re: ROBIN KNUTSON
Respondent:
USP COLEMAN II WARDEN
Brown-El v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Brown-El
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
