Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Middlebrook et al
as 5:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gonzalez-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Scott A. Middlebrooks and Jeffrey Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Granda v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2010cv00551
Plaintiff:
Paulino Granda
Defendant:
Scott Middlebrooks, Michael Pineiro, Jeffrey Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez v. Campbell
as 8:2010cv01789
Plaintiff:
Andreas Martinez
Defendant:
Jeffrey Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Campbell
as 5:2010cv00382
Plaintiff:
Andreas Martinez
Defendant:
Jeffrey Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Campbell et al
as 5:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
Chad Donovan James
Defendant:
Jeffrey Campbell, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mitchell v. Nash et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Dean Mitchell
Defendant:
Patricia Nash, L. Brown, T. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mitchell v. Nash et al
as 5:2009cv00371
Plaintiff:
Wallace Dean Mitchell
Defendant:
Patricia Nash, L. Brown, T. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Autrey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II et al
as 5:2008cv00346
Petitioner:
Vernon Autrey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II, Linda Hawkins, FNU Malanardo and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jackson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP-I et al
as 5:2008cv00224
Plaintiff:
Warren Lavell Jackson
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP-I, Stan Yates, Jeffrey Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Toepfer v. United States of America et al
as 5:2007cv00428
Plaintiff:
devon Toepfer
Defendant:
United States of America, Earl Shaver, George Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
