Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Lopez
as 3:2023cv19349
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez
as 3:2023cv19350
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keith Stansell, et al v. Samark Bello, et al
as 22-13454
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEITH STANSELL, MARC GONSALVES, THOMAS HOWES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMARK JOSE LOPEZ BELLO and YAKIMA TRADING CORPORATION
Interested Party:
PROFIT CORP. CA, SMT TECHNOLOGIA CA and PYP INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17102
Plaintiff:
JOSE RAUL LOPEZ and JOSE LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US Bank National Association v. Jose Lopez
as 22-12705
Plaintiff / Appellee:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LOPEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lopez et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv61194
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez and Farah Ahamed
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03440
Plaintiff:
JOSE LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCAPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01455
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58973
Plaintiff:
JOSE LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
