Cases 21 - 30 of 1,083
Santos Cuevas v. Fulton County District Attorney, et al
as 24-10438
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CUEVAS
Defendant:
FULTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and FULTON COUNTY JUDGE
SANTOS v. ZUNIGA et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
YESENIA MERCED BAUTISTA SANTOS and YESENIA BAUTISTA SANTOS
Defendant:
DIEGO ARMANDO ZUNIGA, WENTZ ENTERPRISES LLC, WSH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jaqueline Mendes, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10199
Petitioner:
JAQUELINE APARECIDA MENDES, ELIEL SANTOS CHAGA and MYLENA MENDES CHAGAS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Elioni Goncalves-Dos Santos, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10167
Petitioner:
ELIONI GONCALVES-DOS SANTOS, EDIVON BORJES DE SILVA, MARIA LOPEZ DOS SANTOS SUZA and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Miguel Santos-Tejada, et al
as 24-10144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL SANTOS-TEJADA
Santos v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
MARISOL SANTOS
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jose Conceicao Santos, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-14108
Petitioner:
JOSE CONCEICAO SANTOS, LUCIENE DOS SANTOS-GOMES, VERONICA DOS SANTOS-GOMES and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
