Cases 41 - 50 of 99
Shah et al v. AIG Property Casualty Company
as 8:2019cv01487
Defendant:
AIG Property Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
NEHA SHAH, SHALIN R SHAH and Shalin R. Shah
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635
Kordbacheh v. Bharti Corp. et al
as 9:2019cv80660
Defendant:
Bharti Corp., Bhartiben Shah, Ruchnaks Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Kordbacheh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv80493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
United States of America v. Shah
as 9:2019cv80298
Defendant:
Bharatkumar Shah
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Borel-Donohue v. Welbilt, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00191
Defendant:
John O. Stewart, Haresh Shah, Hubertus M. Muehlhaeuser and others
Plaintiff:
Christoph Borel-Donohue, The Plymouth County Retirement Association, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust and others
Schlimm v. Welbilt, Inc et al
as 8:2018cv03007
Defendant:
John O. Stewart, Welbilt, Inc, Hubertus M. Muehlhaeuser and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Schlimm
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Fenton v. Welbilt, inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02757
Defendant:
John O. Stewart, Haresh Shah, Welbilt, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Fenton
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Shah et al v. American Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv62376
Defendant:
American Van Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Umang Shah and Monika Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramchanndani v. Gahdhi et al
as 6:2018cv01647
Plaintiff:
Mahesh Ramchanndani
Defendant:
Sunil Gahdhi, Chirag Kabrawala and Nikesh Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silcox et al v. Rodgers et al
as 8:2018cv02339
Defendant:
KAZ 1, LLC, Esplanade Equity, LLC, Bayview Management Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
DRT Ventures, LLC and Frank Silcox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
