Cases 41 - 50 of 273
Wilson v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04543
Plaintiff:
Valister Wilson
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings, LLC, Decision One Mortgage Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Walker et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03307
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, (MERS), US Bank, NA, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Patrice A. George and Richard H. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Walker et al v. Countrywide Home Loans Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03052
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Walker and Patrice A. George
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans Services, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corporation, Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc. and others
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Eckland et al
as 2:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Defendant:
Ronald D. Eckland, AME Financial Corporation, Twenty Six Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Ascent Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02014
Plaintiff:
Sean W. Moore
Defendant:
Ascent Home Loans, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., Selene Finance LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stubbs et al v. Riverside Bank of the Gulf Coast et al
as 2:2016cv00762
Plaintiff:
Cedric Raynard Stubbs and Dechantra Catrecia Stubbs
Defendant:
Riverside Bank of the Gulf Coast, TIB Bank, First Horizon Home Loan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. .83 acres, more or less, over parcel(s) of land of approximately 5.003 acres, more or less and being situated in Land Lot 71 et al
as 1:2016cv03250
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
.83 acres, more or less, over parcel(s) of land of approximately 5.003 acres, more or less and being situated in Land Lot 71, Christine Marie Cali , MERS as nominee for Primary Capital Advisors LC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. .19 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land et al
as 1:2016cv03252
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
.19 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land, Approximately 7.795 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 245, 2"d District, 51h Section, of Douglas County, Georgia and in Land Lot 674, 1st District, 3rd Section, of Paulding County, Approximately 1.098 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 245, 2nd District, 5th Section, of Douglas County, Georgia and in Land Lot 674, 1st District, 3rd Section, of Paulding County and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. 1.84 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land: Approximately 10.001 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lots 570 and 583 of the Third (3rd) Land District in the Third (3rd) Section, et al
as 1:2016cv03226
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
1.84 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land: Approximately 10.001 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lots 570 and 583 of the Third (3rd) Land District in the Third (3rd) Section, approximately 3.00 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lots 570 and 583 of the Third (3rd) Land District in the Third (3rd) Section, Paulding County, Georgia, Bruce Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. .20 acres, more or less, over parcel(s) of land of approximately 1.00 acre, more or less, situated in Land Lot 583 of the 3rd District, 3rd Section, Paulding County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv03227
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
.20 acres, more or less, over parcel(s) of land of approximately 1.00 acre, more or less, situated in Land Lot 583 of the 3rd District, 3rd Section, Paulding County, Georgia, Tyler G. Stenger , MERS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
