Cases 41 - 50 of 704
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06343
Plaintiff:
GARRY MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
ANDRES MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILLS v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
JESSICA HILLS
Respondent:
PISTRO, WINGFIELD, BOOZEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
LUIS DAVID MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
JOHN A MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calafell v. Mendez et al
as 9:2023cv81229
Plaintiff:
Roque Esteban Calafell
Defendant:
Mrs. Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Mrs. Gail Levine, Mrs. Laura Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ewers v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2023cv22978
Plaintiff:
Dale Ainsley Leo Ewers
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, City of Miami Beach and Marissa Tinkler Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv61440
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mendez and Keila Tavarez
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20329
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
