Cases 51 - 57 of 57
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2007cv00434
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Vinson v. Singh et al
as 5:2007cv00368
Plaintiff:
Angela Gail Vinson
Defendant:
Harvinder Singh, Millennium Transport, Inc. and National Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Carib Link,S.A. v. Continental Insurance Company
as 1:2007cv22438
Plaintiff:
Carib Link,S.A.
Defendant:
Continental Insurance Company and Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hachey v. Boatowners Association of the United States et al
as 3:2007cv00343
Plaintiff:
John R. Hachey
Defendant:
Boatowners Association of the United States and Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Beech Street Corporation
as 1:2007cv20412
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Progressive Express Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Beech Street Corporation, Beech Street Corporation and Beech Street Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Bermudez v. Holler Motors, Inc., et al
as 6:2004cv00039
Plaintiff:
Raquel Bermudez
Defendant:
Holler Motors, Inc. doing business as Holler Mitsubishi and Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Rodriguez, et al v. Holler Motors, Inc., et al
as 6:2004cv00026
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rivera Rodriguez and Angel Morel
Defendant:
Holler Motors, Inc. a Florida corporation doing business as Holler Mitsubishi and Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
