Cases 71 - 80 of 116
Lusskin v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014cv23052
Plaintiff:
Bret L. Lusskin, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Benbenisti v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
as 0:2014cv61768
Plaintiff:
Amram Benbenisti
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Oberle v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01730
Plaintiff:
Timothy Oberle
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. and Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Vanover et al v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
as 8:2014cv01363
Plaintiff:
Karen Vanover and Christine Lunford
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gonzalez et al v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv80628
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gonzalez and Alba Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. and Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kreul v. Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00890
Plaintiff:
Jason Kreul
Defendant:
Pendrick Capital Partners, LLC and Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv20125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Boehle v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
as 8:2013cv03258
Plaintiff:
William Boehle
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
