Cases 81 - 90 of 216
Burger King Corporation v. Kazi Restaurants of Hawaii, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv20351
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Kazi Restaurants of Hawaii, Inc. and Zubair M. Kazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Burger King Corporation v. Gunther et al
as 1:2013cv20303
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Joseph R Gunther, Vicki Gunther, RG Missouri, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Burger King Corporation v. Zuberi et al
as 1:2013cv20163
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Shakeb H Zuberi and Syed Musavi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Discrimination
Burger King Corporation v. Worthing et al
as 1:2012cv24151
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Ford B. Worthing, Jr., John L. Worthing, Buxton Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Farhad v. Burger King Corporation
as 9:2012cv81214
Plaintiff:
Kazi Farhad
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burger King Corporation v. Wong et al
as 1:2012cv23729
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Joseph Wong and J and A Food Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Burger King Corporation v. Cobb et al
as 1:2012cv23428
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Charles D. Cobb, Robert T. Chiu, Card Investment, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
