Cases 81 - 87 of 87
Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc
as 3:2011cv00819
Plaintiff:
Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc
Counter_claimant:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc
Counter_defendant:
Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02265
Plaintiff:
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Movant:
CIBA Vision Corporation
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
as 1:2011mi00044
Plaintiff:
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Movant:
CIBA Vision Corporation
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. et al v. Kenneth Crosby New York, LLC
as 3:2009cv00874
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Kenneth Crosby New York, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kenneth Crosby New York, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00828
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Crosby New York, LLC and Kenneth Crosby New York, LLC
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. CIBA Vision Corporation
as 3:2009cv00826
Plaintiff:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Defendant:
CIBA Vision Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CIBA Vision Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
as 3:2008cv01198
Plaintiff:
CIBA Vision Corporation and CIBA Vision Corporation
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.