Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13303
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JASON JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14158
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW H. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36191
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JAMES JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26940
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87510
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CHARLES JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69193
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66673
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW P JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2020cv00087
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
ANDREW B JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv29912
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW G JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
