Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Okeelanta Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OKEELANTA CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
United States Sugar Corporation, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, OKEELANTA CORPORATION and SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
United States Sugar Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 9:2021cv81506
Plaintiff:
United States Sugar Corporation
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Christine E. Wormuth, Jaime A. Pinkham and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
The Buccanneer Condominium Association of Palm Beach Shores, Inc. et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 9:2020cv81117
Plaintiff:
The Buccanneer Condominium Association of Palm Beach Shores, Inc. and Benjamin K. Sharfi
Defendant:
Colonel Andrew D Kelly, Jr., Great American Life Insurance Company and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sierra Club et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 8:2020cv00287
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Todd T. Semonite, Andrew D Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rametta and Sierra Club
Intervenor Defendant:
Pasco County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
