Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31019
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10559
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniel Howard v. BP Exploration & Production Inc, et al
as 22-11074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
HAWKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37923
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HOWARD HAWKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HOWARD
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELOY V BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv03701
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HOWARD MELOY, JR.
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Long v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 15-11994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HOWARD LONG, Individually, as Surviving Spouse and Personal Representative for the Estate of Linda E. Long
Defendant - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., a foreign corporation
In re: Daniel Howard
as 14-12188
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL HOWARD
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Long v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00990
Plaintiff:
Daniel Howard Long
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Howard v. Rauh-Co Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv00857
Plaintiff:
Daniel Howard
Defendant:
Rauh-Co Construction Services, Inc., Paul Rauh Drywall, Inc. and Paul Rauh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
