Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv23165
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Mehmood v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv21207
Defendant:
Acosta, DHS Secretary and United States Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dudova et al v. Whitaker et al
as 4:2018cv10268
Defendant:
Director L. Francis Cissna, Interim Attorney Gen Matthew Whitaker, Associate Director Matthew D. Emrich and others
Plaintiff:
Dasa Dudova and William McGuffey
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv22627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Svetlana Karpeeva, et al v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Sec., et al
as 10-15335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SVETLANA KARPEEVA, CATALINA CASARU, LARA PREACCO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, by and through DHS Secretary and USCIS Director, OFFICER 301, OFFICER 1014 and others
Charles J. Sibley v. U.S Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv21309
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Sibley
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services, USCIS Director, Officer 301 and others
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
