Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Truist Bank, Inc. v. Francis et al
as 1:2020cv04109
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank, Inc. and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Cecil R. Francis, Jr. and CAS Development Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Wash Box, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01965
Plaintiff:
Calvin Gibson
Defendant:
Wash Box, LLC and Cecil R. Francis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. CAS Development Group, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv04150
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
CAS Development Group, LLC and Cecil R. Francis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANCIS v. BATEMAN HARDEN PA et al
as 4:2011cv00639
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R FRANCIS
Defendant:
BATEMAN HARDEN PA, FREDERICK L BATEMAN, JR and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BATEMAN HARDEN PA v. FRANCIS
as 4:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
BATEMAN HARDEN PA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R FRANCIS, MANTRA FILMS INC, MRA HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff B, et al v. Joseph R. Francis, et al
as 10-10664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PLAINTIFF B, PLAINTIFF J, PLAINTIFF S and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
FLORIDA FREEDOM NEWSPAPERS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH R. FRANCIS, MRA HOLDINGS LLC, MANTRA FILMS INC. and others
DOWNING LAW OFFICES, P.A. v. MANTRA FILMS INC et al
as 5:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
DOWNING LAW OFFICES, P.A.
Defendant:
MANTRA FILMS INC, MRA HOLDING LLC and JOSEPH R FRANCIS
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
PLAINTIFF B et al v. FRANCIS et al
as 5:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFF B, PLAINTIFF B, PLAINTIFF B and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R FRANCIS, MRA HOLDINGS LLC, MANTRA FILMS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PITTS v. FRANCIS et al
as 5:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY PITTS
Defendant:
JOSEPH R FRANCIS, MRA HOLDING LLC and MANTRA FILMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
