Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. DOI, et al
as 23-5162
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Heidi Stirrup, et al v. DOD, et al
as 23-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Heidi Stirrup, personally and in her capacity as a member of the United States Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, Mark Edward Green, personally and in his official capacity as a member of the United States Military Academy Board of Visitors, and a Member of the Unites States House Armed Services Committee, and the United States Congress, Ralph Warren Norman, Jr., personally and in his official capacity as a Member of the United States Congress and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, General, USA (Ret.), in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 23-5076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra A. Haaland, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan, MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, Detroit Entertainment, L.L.C. and others
Asante, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Asante, Asante Three Rivers Medical Center, Asante Rouge Valley Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 23-5009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and Food Safety and Inspection Service
Maria Esparraguera v. Department of the Army, et al
as 23-5002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria Esparraguera
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of the Army, Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army, Gabe Camarillo, Under Secretary of the Army and others
Monte Silver, et al v. IRS, et al
as 22-5341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Monte Silver and Monte Silver, Ltd.
Defendant / Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of the Treasury, Charles Rettig, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and others
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 22-5267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Matt Campbell, Diana Hetzel and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli and William Prevatel, AIA
Defendant / Appellee:
Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, James Olthoff, Dr.; in his official capacity as Director of the National Institute for Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology and others
Elizabeth Schacht v. Steven Lieberman, et al
as 22-5221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Doe, M.D. and Elizabeth Schacht, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven L. Lieberman, In his official capacity as Acting Principal Under Secretary for Health, Department of Veteran Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Disciplinary Appeals Board and Eastern Colorado Healthcare System
Sandoz Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 22-5202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandoz Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
