Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Yan Zhao, et al v. Keqiang Li, et al
as 22-7152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yan Zhao, Amer Group LLC, An Bang Group LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Keqiang Li, For his official capacity of The Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Shuqing Guo, The CCP Party Secretary The Branch Committee of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), Hua Yu, the Secretary of the CCP Branch for China Insurance Security Fund Co., Ltd. and others
Yan Zhao, et al v. Keqiang Li, et al
as 22-7138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yan Zhao, Amer Group LLC, An Bang Group LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Keqiang Li, For his official capacity of The Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Shuqing Guo, The CCP Party Secretary The Branch Committee of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), Hua Yu, the Secretary of the CCP Branch for China Insurance Security Fund Co., Ltd. and others
Natl Assoc. of Manufacturers, et al v. SEC, et al
as 13-5252
Petitioner - Appellant:
National Association of Manufacturers, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Business Roundtable
Respondent - Appellee:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor - Appellee:
Amnesty International USA and Amnesty International Limited
Isaac Potter v. Toei Animation Incorporated, et al
as 12-5084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Isaac A. Potter
Defendant - Appellee:
Toei Animation Incorporated and United States of America
Cornell Cornish v. Jon Dudas, et al
as 11-5278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
Jon Dudas, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline , U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Stryker Spine, et al v. Biedermann Motech GMBH, et al
as 10-5418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stryker Spine
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John Carbone, Aaron Markworth, Michael Horan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Biedermann Motech GMBH, Depuy Spine, Inc.,, Lutz Biedermann and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
United States of America
Cornell Cornish v. David Kappos, et al
as 10-5236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
David J. Kappos, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline , U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Cornell Cornish v. David Kappos, et al
as 10-5223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
David J. Kappos, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline , U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Derian Hickman v. Alderson Court Transcripts Ser, et al
as 10-5212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derian Douglas Hickman
Defendant - Appellee:
Alderson Court Transcripts Service For The Supreme Court, Copyright Royalty Board, United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Cornell Cornish v. Jon Dudas, et al
as 10-5096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
Jon Dudas, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline , U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
