Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Center for Biological Diversit v. EPA
as 11-1101
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation and Natural Resources Defense Council of Maine, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa Perez Jackson
State of Texas v. EPA
as 11-1063
Petitioner:
State of Texas, Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, Gregory Wayne Abbott, Attorney General of Texas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of Connecticut, Conservation Law Foundation, Environmental Defense and others
State of Texas v. EPA
as 11-1063
Petitioner:
State of Texas, Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense and others
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA
as 11-1037
Intervenor:
Wyoming Mining Association, Conservation Law Foundation, Environmental Defense and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Utility Air Regulatory Group
Southeastern Legal Foundation, v. EPA
as 10-1131
Petitioner:
John Shimkus, U.S. Representative, Illinois 19th District, John Linder, U.S. Representative, Georgia 7th District, Georgia Agribusiness Council, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Glass Association of North America, State of North Carolina, Utility Air Regulatory Group and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Municipal Gas Commission of Missouri and American Chemistry Council
National Association of Home B v. EPA
as 09-1327
Petitioner:
National Association of Home Builders
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., Conservation Law Foundation and Natural Resources Defense Council
Coalition for Resp. Regulation, et al v. EPA
as 09-1322
Petitioner:
Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., Industrial Minerals Association - North America, National Cattlemen's Beef Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Mountain States Legal Foundation
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Union of Concerned Scientists
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Arizona, State of California, State of Connecticut and others
Movant-Intervenor:
State of Michigan
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Portland Cement Association, State of Nebraska, State of Florida and others
Coalition for Responsible Reg v. EPA
as 09-1322
Intervenor:
Michigan Manufacturers Association, Glass Packaging Institute, State of Utah and others
Petitioner:
Great Northern Project Development, L.P., Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., Rosebud Mining Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
Nicola Scafetta, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, James P. Wallace, III and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. EPA, et al
as 08-1180
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Utility Air Regulatory Group
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
City of Sacramento
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
John Campbell, United States Representative
FPL Engy ME Hydro v. FERC
as 99-1397
Petitioner:
FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
American Rivers Inc., American Whitewater Affiliation, Appalachian Mountain Club and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
New England Legal Foundation and Clifton Power Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
