Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Lokesh Vuyyuru v. Y.S. Reddy, et al
as 24-7066
Plaintiff:
Lokesh B. Vuyyuru, M.D.
Defendant:
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Gowtham Adani, Klaus Schwab and others
Weih Chang v. USA, et al
as 24-5005
Plaintiff:
Weih Steve Chang
Defendant:
United States of America, Christopher A. Wray, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division and "China Initiative Working Group", U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity and others
SEC v. Covington & Burling, LLP
as 23-5212
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent / Appellee:
Covington & Burling, LLP
Intervenor:
John Doe
Saad Aljabri v. Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud, et al
as 22-7150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Saad Aljabri, Dr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud, Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Abdulaziz Foundation, doing business as Misk Foundation, Bader Alasaker and others
Marne Mitskog v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marne K. Mitskog
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Jennie L. Kneedler, Stephen J. Buckingham and others
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security
as 23-5021
In Re:
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Robert Crawford, Adam Dale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carmela Romerio
Defendant / Appellee:
Office of Personnel Management, Guy Cavallo, Chief Information Officer of U.S. Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Kiran Ahuja, Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity and others
John Doe v. SEC
as 23-1124
Petitioner:
John Doe, (Claimant #1)
Respondent:
Securities and Exchange Commission
John Doe v. SEC
as 23-1121
Petitioner:
John Doe, (Claimant #1)
Respondent:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
