Cases 11 - 20 of 304
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5297
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael J. Horowitz, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Martin Akerman v. USA
as 23-5229
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martin Akerman
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Anthony Braxton v. USA
as 23-5221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3149
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Church, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William L. A. Church
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ku Klux Klan, (KKK), Ku Klux Klan GEK, Gek Church and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover, Dir. FBI, (1966-1972) and others
John Demos, Jr., et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Society of T.R.U.T.H
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Washington, D.C., Donald J. Trump, President and others
David Rudometkin v. USA
as 23-5180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Rembert Greeson v. CIA, et al
as 23-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rembert D. Greeson
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency and United States of America
Frank Garcia v. USA, et al
as 23-5151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Nunez Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Phoenix Police Department and Jim Ahearn, FBI, Special Agent In-Charge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
