Cases 21 - 30 of 158
Eric Flores v. TREA, et al
as 22-5006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Flores
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Treasury, United States Department of Justice and Internal Revenue Service
Calvin James v. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Pris
as 21-5295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Calvin B. James
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Henry Francis v. United States Department of
as 17-5233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Henry Francis
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice Office of Information Policy
Daniel Dixon v. DOJ
as 17-5223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5195
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
R. Johnson v. John Roberts, et al
as 17-5200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Roberts, Chief Judge, C. Thomas, Kennedy, Justice and others
Van Jenkins v. DOJ
as 17-5184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Van Jenkins
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Keith Webb-el v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 17-5159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith B. Webb-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas R. Kane, Director, U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, Commissioner, U.S. Parole Commission, A. Smith, A-2 Unit Counselor, Federal Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeremy Pinson v. DOJ, et al
as 17-5120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., John Dignam and Thomas R. Kane, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
