Cases 41 - 50 of 158
Victor Rodriguez v. DOJ, et al
as 16-5251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Rodriguez
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Information Policy, United States Department of Justice and United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for United States Attorney's Office
Anthony Lewis v. USA, et al
as 16-5218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Janet Reno and others
Roy Hudspeth v. DOJ, et al
as 16-5210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roy J. Hudspeth
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and Known and Unknown Individual Officers of the Federal Courts
Edward Harvey v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 16-5200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward Harvey
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Internal Affairs and others
John Passmore v. DOJ
as 16-5076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Passmore
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Joseph Ladeairous v. DOJ
as 16-5068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Michael Ladeairous
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abdul Love v. DOJ
as 16-5033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdul Love
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Charles Neuman v. USA, et al
as 16-5007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Neuman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
William Price v. U.S. DOJ Attorney Office, et al
as 15-5314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William S. Price
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney Office, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
