Cases 11 - 20 of 50
State of Texas, et al v. NHTSA, et al
as 22-1144
Petitioner:
State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Indiana and others
Respondent:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Steven Cliff, in his offical capacity as Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, United States Department of Transportation and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1031
Petitioner:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Michael Floyd v. State of Indiana, et al
as 21-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Glen Floyd, also known as Five Trees, also known as Chief of the Eel River Tribe of Indiana
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Indiana, Miami Nation of Indians, Eiteljorge Museum of American Indian and Western Art and others
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
Raj Patel v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, Veronica Syretia Root Martinez, University of Notre Dame Du Lac and others
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5201
Amicus Curiae:
State of North Dakota, State of Arkansas, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Yankton Sioux Tribe, 16cv1796, Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Not Yet Classified:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Dakota Access LLC
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5197
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Dakota Access LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267, Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others
Not Yet Classified:
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Steve Vance
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, North Dakota Farm Bureau, American Line Pipe Producers Association and others
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al
as 20-7062
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party:
State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth W. Kennedy
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
