Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Redha Al-Najar, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 09-5267
Petitioner - Appellee: Redha Al-Najar, Detainee and Houcine Al-Najar, As Next Friend of Redha al-Najar
Respondent - Appellant: Robert M. Gates, As Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Barack Obama, As President of the United States, John Doe 1, Custodian of Petitoner and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae For Appellee: U.S. Army Ranger Association, Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein and others
Redha Al-Najar, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 09-5267
Petitioner: Redha Al-Najar, Detainee and Houcine Al-Najar, As Next Friend of Redha al-Najar
Respondent: Robert M. Gates, As Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Barack Obama, As President of the United States, John Doe 1, Custodian of Petitoner and others
Amicus Curiae: Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Not Yet Classified: U.S. Army Ranger Association, Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein and others
Fadi Maqaleh, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 09-5265
Petitioner: Fadi Al Maqaleh, Detainee and Ahmad Al Maqaleh, as Next Friend of Fadi Al Maqaleh
Defendant / Appellant: Robert M. Gates, Secretary, United States Department of Defense
Respondent: John Doe, Custodian of Petitioner and John Doe 2, Custodian of Petitioner, Respondents sued in their official capacity
Amicus Curiae: Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Not Yet Classified: Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein, People for the American Way Foundation and others
Amin Al Bakri, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 09-5266
Petitioner: Amin Al Bakri, Detainee, United States Air Base at Bagram, Afghanistan and Muhammad Al Bakri, as the Next Friend of Amin Al Bakri
Respondent: Barack Obama, as President of the United States, Robert M. Gates, as Secretary, United States Department of Defense, John Doe 1, Custodian of Petitioner and others
Amicus Curiae: Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Not Yet Classified: Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein, People for the American Way Foundation and others
In re: Robert Gates, et al
as 09-8005
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Robert M. Gates, As Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Barack Obama, As President of the United States, John Doe 1, Custodian of Petitoner and others
: and
In re: Robert Gates, et al
as 09-8003
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Robert M. Gates, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, John Doe, Custodian of Petitioner and John Doe 2, Custodian of Petitioner, Respondents sued in their official capacity
: and
In re: Barack Obama, et al
as 09-8004
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Barack Obama, as President of the United States, Robert M. Gates, as Secretary, United States Department of Defense, John Doe 1, Custodian of Petitioner and others
: and
Harvey Hudson v. Attorney General of the United, et al
as 09-5090
Plaintiff - Appellant: Harvey J. Hudson
Defendant - Appellee: Attorney General of the United States, US Department of Justice, District of Columbia Government, Office of Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Director and others
Amer Imgrtn Law Assn, et al v. Reno, Janet, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 98-5463
Plaintiff - Appellant: American Immigration Lawyers Association, New York Immigration Coalition, Northern California Coalition for Immigrant Rights and others
Defendant - Appellee: Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, Doris M. Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and Kevin D. Rooney, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review
Defendant - Terminated Party: Anthony Moscato, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Lawyers Committee for Human Rights and Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?