Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 102
State of New York, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1019
Petitioner: State of Delaware, State of New Jersey, State of Maryland and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Undetermined: Homer City Generation, L.P., Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Utility Air Regulatory Group and others
Rose Duru v. DOJ, et al
as 17-5235
Plaintiff - Appellant: Rose Adanma Duru
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Justice, Karen Mitchell, U.S. District Court Clerk for the Northern District of Texas and others
Matthew Grace, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7067
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, State of Montana, State of Hawaii and others
Defendant / Appellant: Peter Newsham, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, Cathy L. Lanier, in her official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department and District of Columbia
Plaintiff / Appellee: Matthew Grace and Pink Pistols
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1155
Petitioner: Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics, Clean Air Council and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and E. Scott Pruitt, Adminstrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Petitioner: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Intervenor For Respondent: American Chemistry Council, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1053
Petitioner: State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1021
Petitioner: State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, In her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1022
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, Acting Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1428
Petitioner: State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Environmental Defense Fund and Sierra Club
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1257
Petitioner: State of Texas, Railroad Commission of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 16-5220
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Interested Party - Appellant: Lindsay Jenkins

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?