Cases 41 - 50 of 87
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al
as 13-5248
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State National Bank of Big Spring, 60 Plus Association, Inc. and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of South Carolina, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jacob J. Lew, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Treasury and ex officio Chairman of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, United States Department of the Treasury, Richard Cordray, In his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in his official capacity as ex officio Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and in his official capacity as ex officio member of the Finan and others
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al
as 13-5247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State National Bank of Big Spring, 60 Plus Association, Inc. and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of South Carolina, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jacob J. Lew, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury, Richard Cordray, In his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in his official capacity as ex officio Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and in his official capacity as ex officio member of the Finan and others
Lloyd Fleming v. Richard Coward, et al
as 12-5259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lloyd J. Fleming
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard A. Coward, Walter W. Tweedy, Officer, Pool, Officer and others
Martha's Vineyard/Dukes County, et al v. John E. Bryson, et al
as 11-5311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martha's Vineyard/Dukes County Fisherman's Association and Michael S. Flaherty
Defendant - Appellee:
Gary F. Locke, Secretary of the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Duke Energy Ohio, Incorporated, et al v. FERC
as 11-1419
Petitioner:
Duke Energy Ohio, Incorporated and Duke Energy Kentucky, Incorporated
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
American Electric Power Serv., et al v. FCC, et al
as 11-1146
Petitioner:
American Electric Power Service Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, Entergy Services, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
MD Public Service Commission, et al v. FERC
as 09-1296
Petitioner:
Maryland Public Service Commission and New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Municipal Power, Inc., American Public Power Association, Maryland Office of People's Counsel and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Edison Mission Energy, PPL Companies, Liberty Electric Power, LLC and others
J. Trent Mosby v. Duke Terrell, et al
as 09-5131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. Trent Mosby
Defendant - Appellee:
Duke Terrell, In his personal capacity and Harley G. Lappin, In his personal capacity
EPIC Merchant Energy LP v. FERC
as 08-1395
Petitioner:
EPIC Merchant Energy LP, SESCO Enterprises, LLC and CAM Energy Trading, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Public Service Company of Colorado, Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Southwestern Public Service Company and others
EPIC Merchant Energy LP v. FERC
as 08-1395
Petitioner:
EPIC Merchant Energy LP, SESCO Enterprises LLC and CAM Energy Trading, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Otter Tail Corporation, Integrys Energy Services, Inc., Cargill Power Markets, LLC and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Wisconsin Electric Power Company, Duke Energy Business Services LLC, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
