Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 105
Environmental Defense Fund v. EPA, et al
as 09-1334
Petitioner: Environmental Defense Fund
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of California, State of Arizona, State of Delaware and others
Energy Recovery Council v. EPA
as 09-1326
Petitioner: Energy Recovery Council
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Natural Resources Defense Council, State of California, State of Arizona and others
American Chemistry Council v. EPA
as 09-1325
Petitioner: American Chemistry Council
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Natural Resources Defense Council, State of California, State of Arizona and others
American Petroleum Institute, et al v. EPA
as 09-1328
Petitioner: American Petroleum Institute and National Petrochemical & Refiners Association
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Natural Resources Defense Council, State of California, State of Arizona and others
Coalition for Resp. Regulation, et al v. EPA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1322
Petitioner: Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., Industrial Minerals Association - North America, National Cattlemen's Beef Association and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: Mountain States Legal Foundation
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Union of Concerned Scientists
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of Arizona, State of California, State of Connecticut and others
Movant-Intervenor: State of Michigan
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Portland Cement Association, State of Nebraska, State of Florida and others
Coalition for Responsible Reg v. EPA
as 09-1322
Intervenor: Michigan Manufacturers Association, Glass Packaging Institute, State of Utah and others
Petitioner: Great Northern Project Development, L.P., Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., Rosebud Mining Company and others
Amicus Curiae: Nicola Scafetta, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, James P. Wallace, III and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Chamber of Commerce of the US, et al v. EPA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1237
Petitioner: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and National Automobile Dealers Association
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Environment California and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: Pacific Legal Foundation
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Sempra Energy, Charles E. Frank and others
State of New York, et al v. EPA
as 08-1279
Petitioner: State of New York, State of California, State of Connecticut and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
State of New York v. EPA
as 08-1202
Petitioner: State of New York, State of California, by and through Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of the State of California, California Air Resources Board and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
State of New York v. EPA
as 08-1179
Petitioner: State of New York, State of Arizona, State of Connecticut and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent: Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and National Automobile Dealers Association
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Utility Air Regulatory Group
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: City of Sacramento
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent: John Campbell, United States Representative

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?