Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1059
Petitioner: State of Oklahoma, State of West Virginia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff: United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Other: Brad Greenspan
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae: Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
State of Wisconsin v. EPA, et al
as 23-1201
Petitioner: State of Wisconsin
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Kinder Morgan, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 23-1181
Petitioner: Kinder Morgan, Inc.
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Intervenor: State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae: William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
State of Alabama, et al v. EPA
as 16-1204
Intervenor: American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Exelon Corporation and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae: Robert P. Mason, Celia Y. Chen, Noelle Eckley Selin and others
Petitioner: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas, State of Arizona and others
Domingo Gomez, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 20-5292
Plaintiff / Appellee: Somya Arora, 20cv1906, K.G.S.M., 20cv2128, Mustafa Madazli, 20cv1926 and others
Defendant / Appellee: J.M.A.A., (A MINOR) 20cv1856, Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jodi Lynn Karpes, Shipco Transport, Inc., Loida Phelps and others
Amicus Curiae: Splunk Inc., State of California, Marisa S. Cianciarulo and others
State of New York, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1076
Petitioner: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Wisconsin, State of California and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, as Acting Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?