Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Erwin Whitter v. William Barr
as 20-1217
Respondent:
William P. Barr, US Attorney General
Petitioner:
Erwin Whitter
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher Strunk, et al v. DOS, et al
as 14-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Earl Strunk and Harold W. Van Allen
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of State, Central Intelligence Agency, Barack Hussein Obama and others
Roger Waldner v. DOJ, et al
as 13-5350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roger D. Waldner
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General
Timothy Guess v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-5047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Wayne Guess
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General
Timothy Parrack v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-5249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy J. Parrack
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General
Tilman Partin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-5214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tilman Rufus Partin
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General of Washington DC
Gary deWilliams v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-5122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary deWilliams, (NMN)
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General, and his Successor, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman and his Successor, in their Official and Personal Capacities and United States Parole Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Keith Judd v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 10-5364
Petitioner - Appellant:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General, Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
