Cases 121 - 130 of 150
BROWN v. CHARLES COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 1:2009cv02438
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
CHARLES COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and SELKIRK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS, et al v. KOENIG, et al
as 1:2002cv00618
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. HARRIS , REGINALD E. HOWARD and PETER M. THORNTON, SR.
Defendant:
JAMES E. KOENIG , WASTE MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC. , WASTE MANAGEMENT RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
WILDER v. BARRY et al
as 1:2009cv02264
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN BARRY and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
WILDER v. BOLDEN et al
as 1:2009cv02266
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
CHARLES BOLDEN, ERIC HOLDER, UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
WILDER v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2009cv02265
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
BROWN v. MARLBORO TOWING, INC.
as 1:2009mc00626
Defendant:
MARLBORO TOWING, INC.
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
v. BROWN et al
as 1:2009mc00629
Defendant:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR. and GEORGE P. PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BROWN v. DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND, ET AL.
as 1:2009mc00627
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND and PATRICK DULEY
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BROWN v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR AAC
as 1:2009mc00628
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
CIRCUIT COURT FOR AAC and PAMELA L. NORTH
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
BROWN v. CONGRESSIONAL MOTORS, INC. et al
as 1:2009mc00630
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
CONGRESSIONAL MOTORS, INC. and CARLOS ARIAS
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
