Cases 51 - 57 of 57
BECKER, et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al
as 1:2001cv00811
Plaintiff:
SEEDS OF PEACE, INC. , ELIZABETH T. BUTLER , KIMBERLY GRIER and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT , CHARLES H. RAMSEY , TERRANCE W. GAINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARRELL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00931
Plaintiff:
BERNETTA FARRELL, MARLANA MATTHEWS, CRYSTAL MCCOY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
THOMAS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00231
Plaintiff:
KANISHA THOMAS, ANGELA HINES, ITZETHT TESTA-SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALLEN et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv01398
Plaintiff:
JEANNE ALLEN, D.A., PATRICIA JACKSON and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
TUCKER v. RTS WRIGHT INDUSTRIES, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv01234
Defendant:
RTS WRIGHT INDUSTRIES, LLC , DOERFER COMPANIES and WRIGHT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LESLYE TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
BUSH et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv01110
Plaintiff:
JOYCELYNN BUSH, JULIA HUNTER, CAROL COLEMAN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
In Re: LORAZEPAM/CLORAZE, et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, et al
as 1:1999mc00276
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION , STATE OF FLORIDA , STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. , CAMBREX CORPORATION , PROFARMACO S.R.L. and others
Movant:
AETNA US HEALTHCARE , CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STEVEN ARONSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
