Cases 1 - 10 of 16
USA v. Joshua Haynes
as 23-3065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joshua Dillon Haynes
Xiu Jian Sun v. R. Lawrence, et al
as 22-5024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, The Spiritual Adam
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States, Joshua Lynn Rogers, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Fred E. Haynes, Assistant U.S. Attorney and others
Xiu Sun, et al v. R. Lawrence, et al
as 20-5112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, The Spiritual Adam
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel F. Van Horn, Patricia King McBride, Assistant United States Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS et al v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2019cv02886
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN and CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
Defendant:
JOSHUA LYNN ROGERS, R. CRAIG LAWRENCE, JESSIE K. LIU and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
HAYNES v. FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Defendant:
TD AMERITRADE HOLDING INC and FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HAYNES
NLRB v. Haynes Building Services, LLC
as 16-1136
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Haynes Building Services, LLC
Haynes Building Services, LLC v. NLRB
as 16-1099
Petitioner:
Haynes Building Services, LLC
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
HUNT v. CLARK et al
as 1:2015mc00788
Plaintiff:
PHAYLYN M. HUNT
Defendant:
DENISE M. CLARK, LESLIE JANE HAYNES, DENISE SIMMONDS and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
James Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 14-7182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James R. Haynes
Defendant - Appellee:
Navy Federal Credit Union
HAYNES v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HAYNES
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
