Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5156
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, Miami Waterkeeper and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Leopoldo Miranda-Castro, in his official capacity as Regional Director for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, John Forbes Blevins, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator for Region 4 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
State of Florida, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd.
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5159
Intervenor:
Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd., State of Florida and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Plaintiff:
Miami Waterkeeper, Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Radhika Fox, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, John Forbes Blevins, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator for Region 4 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
State of Nebraska, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1129
Petitioner:
State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, In his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Indiana, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5101
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Radhika Fox, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd., State of Florida and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Amicus Curiae:
The Florida Chamber of Commerce, The Association of Florida Community Developers, Incorporated (AFCD), The Mosaic Company and others
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1087
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1059
Petitioner:
State of Oklahoma, State of West Virginia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1050
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
Lena Lindberg v. Bruce Assam, et al
as 23-7137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lena Marie Lindberg
Defendant / Appellee:
Bruce Lee Assam, Vincent Albert Citro, Edward Melvin Fitzgerald and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
