Cases 31 - 40 of 251
DUSENBERRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.
as 1:2019cv02716
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS and NELSON EDWARD DUSENBERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT THOMAS CHRISTIAN, MATT MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS et al
as 1:2019cv02770
Defendant:
SYDNEY J. HOFFMAN, PRESTON BURTON, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEHOE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02495
Respondent:
DONALD J. TRUMP and PETER STROZOK
Petitioner:
ANNE KEHOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02391
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY, WORLD BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SOCIETY OF T.R.U.T.H. and JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02385
Defendant:
U.S. MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONALD v. MELGREN
as 1:2019cv02312
Defendant:
ERIC F. MELGREN
Plaintiff:
JAMES DONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRITT v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02310
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. BRITT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
COLEMAN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02187
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HARVEY v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02196
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ADRION HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ABDULKADER v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02199
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
MUNIR ABDULKADER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
