Cases 61 - 70 of 308
KLAYMAN v. KAISER et al
as 1:2021cv00965
Defendant:
MATTHEW KAISER, JULIA PORTER, HAMILTON FOX, III and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ROTENBERG v. POLITICO LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
MARC ROTENBERG
Defendant:
POLITICO LLC, PROTOCOL MEDIA, LLC, ROBERT L. ALLBRITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNES v. WP COMPANY LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00506
Defendant:
WP COMPANY LLC doing business as THE WASHINGTON POST and ELLEN NAKASHIMA
Plaintiff:
DEVIN G. NUNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PANNELL v. PROTECTION STRATEGIES INCORPORATED
as 1:2021cv00602
Plaintiff:
Carl E Pannell, Jr and CARL E. PANNELL, JR.
Defendant:
Protection Strategies Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. MEAD et al
as 1:2021cv00276
Defendant:
ERIC ADAM GOODMAN, H. SUTTON, SCOTT NEILSON and others
Plaintiff:
YOMIKALAN TASHASHA JUNE WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
AINLEY et al v. WASHBURN
as 1:2020cv03825
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL AINLEY, BILL VAN LOO and ERIN BERTRAM
Defendant:
EDWARD WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DURU v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00649
Defendant:
ANGELA D. CAESAR, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, CLERK'S OFFICE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYD COMPANY LTD v. ALLIANCE FOR AMERICAN MANUFACTURING et al
as 1:2020cv03458
Plaintiff:
BYD COMPANY LTD
Defendant:
CATHALIJNE ADAMS, SCOTT NORMAN PAUL, MATTHEW MCMULLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARUNACHALAM v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2020cv03734
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, LAW360/PORTFOLIO MEDIA, INC., JEFFREY ATKINS and others
Plaintiff:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv03457
Defendant:
CATHALIJNE ADAMS, MATTHEW MCMULLAN, ALLIANCE FOR AMERICAN MANUFACTURING and others
Plaintiff:
BYD COMPAY LTD. and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
