Cases 1 - 10 of 376
SHAPLEY et al v. LOWELL
as 1:2024cv02646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ZIEGLER and GARY SHAPLEY
Defendant:
ABBE LOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Devin Nunes v. WP Company LLC, et al
as 24-7107
Defendant:
WP Company LLC, doing business as Washington Post and Ellen Nakashima
Plaintiff:
Devin G. Nunes
SPICER v. U.S. MARSHALS OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv02106
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
DEONTE V. SPICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HOLLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01536
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN G. HOLLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Luis Castillo Butters v. National Academy of Sciences, et al
as 24-7068
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime Castillo Butters
Defendant:
National Academy of Sciences and Marcia McNutt
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch of United States Government
as 24-5090
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Judicial Branch of United States Government
BOBULINSKI v. GOLDMAN
as 1:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BOBULINSKI
Defendant:
DANIEL GOLDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Aror-Ark O'Diah v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5074
Plaintiff:
Aror-ark Ark O'diah
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, United States Small Business Administration, also known as United States Small Business Administration, SBA, Isabella Casillas Guzman, SBA Administrator and others
ROYALL v. HILLIARD et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Charles Monte Royall
Defendant:
ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. DBA ECKERD CONNECTS, Carl Hilliard and ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. doing business as ECKERD CONNECTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Michael Bullock v. Hana Security Services, et al
as 24-5055
Plaintiff:
Michael Bullock
Defendant:
Hana Security Services, Sam Estes, Regional Manager, Ronald Best, Contract Manager - IRS/DC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
